What is Cut-off Procedure?
The process to ensure that transactions are recorded in the proper
accounting period is known as cutoff . For inventory, the general rule is that all items owned by the
entity as of the inventory date should be included, regardless of location. For
goods in transit, if they are shipped free on board (fob) destination,
ownership does not pass from the seller to the purchaser until the purchaser
receives the goods from the common carrier. For goods shipped fob shipping
point, title passes from the seller to the purchaser once the seller turns the
goods over to the common carrier.
In practice, purchases are recorded upon
receipt, based on the date indicated on the receiving report. Inventory
generally is relieved for items sold as of the date of shipment. In this
manner, the accounting entries to record the purchase and sale of inventory
correspond to the physical movement of the goods at the company. Assuming an
accurate physical count of goods on hand is achieved, companies effectively
eliminate cutoff errors by verifying that purchases have been recorded in the
period of receipt and sales have been recorded in the period of shipment. This usually
is accomplished by matching accounts payable invoices to receiving reports, and
matching sales invoices to shipping documents. The procedure described above
guarantees that both sides of the accounting entry are recorded in the same
period.
The
inventory amount is recorded through the physical count and valuation, whereas
the accounts payable/cost of sales amount is recorded through the matching
procedure. This method implies all purchases are fob destination and all sales are
fob shipping point. Although this is unlikely to be the case, the approach
works in practice because goods in transit are typically not significant, and
the procedure is applied consistently. Companies that have a significant volume
of goods in transit and varying terms regarding transfer of ownership should
scrutinize the inventory cutoff calculations. For example, a fob destination sale
that was in transit at period end would be recorded prematurely using the
method described above. As a result, pretax income would be overstated by the
gross margin on the sale, accounts receivable would be overstated, and
inventory would be understated. Such a situation normally is considered more of
a revenue recognition issue than an inventory issue. The effect of a similar
situation for a purchase would merely affect the balance sheet, because there is
no margin involved for the buyer.
Legal Complications in Determining Stock Cut-off
In situations where a strict legal
determination of ownership is impractical or other cutoff questions arise, the
terms of the sales agreement, the intent of the parties involved, industry
practices, and other factors should be considered.
Prerequisites for Effective Cut-off of Inventory Stock
Achieving
an accurate cutoff is enhanced by controlling the shipping, receiving, and transfer
activity during the physical count. Also, source documents (e.g., receiving
reports, shipping reports, bills of lading) pertaining to goods shipped and
received around the inventory date must be reviewed closely to verify that
transactions have been recorded in the proper period.
Great post. Keep it up. Thank you so much for sharing your valuable blog. i am waiting for your next blog. Get more…. Vendor Reconciliation | Freezer Audit
ReplyDeleteBank Reconciliation
Your blog was very interesting & easy to understand. Thank you so much sharing that Inventory Audit
ReplyDeleteRelated blog.. Fixed Assets Audit